M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto

Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

Causation Law
 
Teamsters Union v. Warner Chilcott Limited





MoreLaw Performance Marketing


If It Does Not Work, It Is Free!


<... More...
   $0 (10-17-2018 - MA)

Harvey Lee Funches v. Progressive Tractor and Implement Company, L.L.C.





Harvey Lee Funches lost his left arm when his vehicle collided with a piece of farm equipment being towed by a pickup truck as the two passed one another on a Mississippi road. The only live dispute left in this case is Funches’s suit against Progressive Tractor and Implement Company,... More...
   $0 (10-15-2018 - MS)

Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., et al.





Whole Foods Market, Inc.—an international grocery-store chain specializing in organic products—recently ran into trouble with several state and local consumer-protection agencies for weights-and-measures violations. On multiple occasions, Whole Foods admitted to mislabeling prepa... More...
   $0 (10-14-2018 - TX)

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.




This appeal was brought to contest the approval of a class-action settlement. Dr. David Muransky filed a class action against Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. for violating the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”). Appe... More...
   $0 (10-11-2018 - )

John Doe v. The Regents of the University of California

Due process - two preeminent words that are the lifeblood
of our Constitution. Not a precise term, but most everyone knows
when it is present and when it is not. It is often most
conspicuous by its absence. Its primary characteristic is fairness.
It is self-evident that a trial, an adjudication, or a hearing that
may adversely affect a person’s life must be conducted with
f... More...
   $0 (10-11-2018 - CA)

KEITH LUMRY v. STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, and ROBERT BLECHA










_

The facts here have already been summarized in both the prior Court of Appeals decision, Lumry v. State, 49 Kan. App. 2d 27... More...
   $0 (10-09-2018 - KS)

Shavonda Hawkins v. The Kroger Company

Trans fat has become increasingly recognized as a
dangerous substance and a leading cause of numerous serious
ailments, including heart disease and diabetes. Food and Drug
Administration (“FDA”) regulations govern the information
reported within a food product’s Nutrition Facts Panel on the
product’s label.1 As for trans fat, FDA regulations provided,
at all relevant times,... More...
   $0 (10-09-2018 - CA)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ISHMAEL ABDULLAH, a/k/a Ish, a/k/a Gangsta, a/k/a Papi





MoreLaw Suites - Legal Suites and Virtual Offices - Downtown Tulsa-- Best Places In Downtown Tulsa To Practice Law



Abdullah was involved in a drug-tr... More...   $0 (10-08-2018 - NJ)

Timothy Vanderberg v. Petco Animal Supplies Store, Inc., d/b/a Pet Food Warehouse and Petco

The rules governing litigation in federal courts ensure fair and orderly
proceedings free from prejudicial surprises. All litigants must disclose the identity
of any expert witnesses they plan to use and, for non-retained experts such as treating
physicians, they must disclose the subject matter and a summary of the facts and
opinions to which the expert is expected to testify (abs... More...
   $0 (10-08-2018 - IL)

Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.





Whole Foods Market, Inc.—an international grocery-store chain specializing in organic products—recently ran into trouble with several state and local consumer-protection agencies for weights-and-measures violations. On multiple occasions, Whole Foods admitted to mislabeling prepa... More...
   $0 (10-05-2018 - TX)

Kristen Giovanni v. United States Department of the Navy





The Giovanni family and the Palmer family live in neighborhoods close to contaminated federal facilities that were owned and operated for decades by the United States Navy. The families filed separate suits in state court under the P... More...
   $0 (10-03-2018 - PA)

Khalda Jabo v. YMCA of San Diego County

Defendant and respondent YMCA of San Diego County (Respondent or the
YMCA) provides a number of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) on its premises,
for the emergency use of its members, employees and users of the premises. (Health &
2
Saf. Code,1 § 1797.196, subd. (b) [regulatory scheme when AEDs are provided on
premises].) Plaintiffs and appellants are the Jabo family, ... More...
   $0 (09-30-2018 - CA)

STATE OF OHIO vs. DANIELLE LUCE





Defendant-Appellant Danielle R. Luce appeals her multi-count conviction,
in the Court of Common Pleas, Ashland County, for involuntary manslaughter, aggravated
drug trafficking, corrupting another with drugs, and other offenses. Appellee is th... More...
   $0 (09-28-2018 - OH)

Kendra Crocker v. Stanley Glanz





Eric Grant was assaulted and raped by another inmate while in custody at the
Tulsa County Jail. Grant’s co-guardians filed suit on his behalf against Sheriff
Stanley Glanz under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting supervisory liability. Glanz has
filed this interlocutory... More...
   $0 (09-25-2018 - OK)

George Alvarez v. The City of Brownsville





This case was reheard en banc after the Appellee, George Alvarez, had his $2.3 million judgment reversed and his claims against the City of Brownsville dismissed by a panel of this court. The en banc court has carefully considered two impo... More...
   $0 (09-25-2018 - TX)

Peggy Shumpert v. City of Tupelo




Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their Fourth Amendment, 28 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force and state law claims against Defendants-Appellees, the City of Tupelo and Officer Cook. Plaintiffs also appeal the district court... More...
   $0 (09-25-2018 - MS)

Amy Arlene Turner v. Seterus, Inc.

In this wrongful foreclosure case, plaintiffs Amy Arlene Turner and Joseph Zeleny
sought damages from defendant Seterus, Inc. (Seterus) on the theory that Seterus had
“frustrated [their] lawful attempt, pursuant to [Civil] Code [section] 2924c, to cure their
default more than five days prior to the noticed foreclosure sale.” The trial court
sustained Seterus’s demurrer to their thi... More...
   $0 (09-25-2018 - CA)

Herman N. Nunes v. HIE Holdings, Inc. Federal Courthouse - Honolulu, Hawaii

In 2008, Congress enacted the ADA Amendments Act
(“ADAAA”), which broadened the definition of disability
under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),
42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. As relevant to this appeal, the
ADAAA expanded the scope of the ADA’s “regarded-as”
definition of disability. We have not opined on this issue
in the ten years since the ADAAA was enacted and s... More...
   $0 (09-19-2018 - HI)

Nicholas Sampson v. Investigator William Lambert District of Nebraska Federal Courthouse - Omaha, Nebraska

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. (“St. Paul Insurance”) appeals the
district court’s grant of summary judgment to Matthew Livers and Nicholas Sampson.
Chief Judge Smith and Judge Colloton file this * opinion pursuant to 8th Cir.
Rule 47E.
-4-
The court concluded that St. Paul Insurance had a duty under its coverage policy to
indemnify David Kofoed for intentional acts... More...
   $0 (09-18-2018 - NE)

STATE OF OHIO v. MITCHELL D. WEBSTER MoreLaw Suites Legal Suites and Virtual Offices In Downtown Tulsa 406 South Boulder 918-582-3993 or Info@morelaw.com

Mitchell D. Webster appeals from his conviction and sentence following a jury
trial on one count of gross neglect of a patient in violation of R.C. 2903.34(A)(2), a first
degree misdemeanor.
{¶ 2} Webster advances two assignments of error. First, he challenges the legal
sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence to support his conviction. Second, he
claims the trial c... More...
   $0 (09-16-2018 - OH)

Brian Reynolds v. Henderson & Lyman and Douglas Arend Northern District of Illinois Courthouse - Chicago, Illinois Morelaw Internet Marketing National Find A Lawyer Directory 888-354-4529

This appeal arises out of a malpractice suit that Brian Reynolds brought against the law firm Hen-derson & Lyman and one of its lawyers (collectively “H&L”), alleging that H&L gave negligent advice to several LLCs that Reynolds co-owned and managed. According to Reynolds, H&L’s bad advice led him to violate federal disclosure laws
2 No. 17-1999
when he drafted the LLCs’ financial statement... More...
   $0 (09-12-2018 - IL)

Cheryl Searcy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. Middle District of Florida Federal Courthouse - Tampa, Florida

Cheryl Searcy (“Plaintiff”) sued the defendants, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Philip Morris Inc. (together, “Defendants”) for unintentional and intentional torts arising from the death of her mother, Carol Lasard, alleging that Lasard’s illnesses were caused by her addiction to cigarettes manufactured by Defendants. The jury found for Plaintiff on both the unintentional and intentional tort c... More...   $0 (09-12-2018 - FL)

Richard Dent v. National Football League Northern District of California Federal Courthouse - San Francisco Morelaw Internet Marketing National Find A Lawyer Directory 888-354-4529

This appeal requires us to decide whether a variety of
state-law claims brought against the National Football
League (NFL) by former professional football players are
preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act
(LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 141.
The district court held that the players’ claims are
preempted and dismissed their suit. We disagree. As pled,
the players’... More...
   $0 (09-10-2018 - CA)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMY GONZALEZ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID MATUSIEWICZ

David Matusiewicz1 and Christine Belford were married from 2001 to 2006, during which time they had three children, L.M.1, L.M.2, and K.M.1 (the “children”). The couple and their children also lived with Belford’s one child from a previous marriage, K.M.2.2 After their divorce, Belford and David engaged in a bitter custody dispute, during which David accused Belford of being an unfit mother and ... More...   $0 (09-09-2018 - DE)

William Schadhauser v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, William Spikes v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Jared T. Ferguson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

In April 2016, appellants each filed an individual complaint against ODRC asserting a negligence claim. Appellants are all inmates or prior inmates of ODRC once housed at Chillicothe Correctional Institution ("CCI"), and each of the individual appellants have been diagnosed with a medical condition known as histoplasmosis. Appellants alleged in their complaints that they contracted histoplasmosi... More...   $0 (09-08-2018 - OH)

Next Page

 
 
Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2018 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.