Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 12-19-2023

Case Style:

Charles Love, et aux. v. Independent Cold Enterprise, LLC, et al.

Case Number: 2:23-cv-03280

Judge: Craig M. Straw

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer Directory




Defendant's Attorney: Matthew David Garson

Description: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 230800142, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

"Pennsylvania auto negligence law operates under a modified comparative negligence system, which means that both parties involved in an accident can be partially responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver has a legal duty to act with reasonable care towards other drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. This includes obeying traffic laws, maintaining a safe speed, and being alert and avoiding distractions.

Breach of Duty:

A driver breaches their duty of care when they behave in a negligent manner, such as:
Speeding
Distracted driving
Driving under the influence
Ignoring traffic signals or signs
Following too closely
Reckless driving

Causation:

The driver's breach of duty must have directly caused the accident and resulting injuries. There must be a clear link between the negligence and the harm suffered.

Damages:

If negligence and causation are proven, the injured party can recover damages for:
Medical expenses
Lost wages or income
Pain and suffering
Emotional distress
Property damage

Modified Comparative Negligence:

Unlike a pure comparative negligence system, Pennsylvania allows the injured party to recover damages even if they contributed to the accident, as long as their negligence is less than 51%. This means that if you are found to be 40% at fault for the accident, you can still recover 60% of your damages from the other driver.
However, if your negligence exceeds 51%, you are barred from recovering any damages from the other driver.

Other Important Points:

Pennsylvania also has a limited tort option that allows drivers to choose lower insurance premiums in exchange for limiting their ability to recover non-economic damages like pain and suffering.
There are specific laws governing accidents involving motorcycles, bicycles, and pedestrians.
It's always advisable to consult with a qualified legal professional if you have been involved in a car accident, even if the injuries seem minor. They can help you navigate the legal process and fight for the compensation you deserve.

Additional Resources:

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation: https://www.penndot.gov/: https://www.penndot.gov/
Pennsylvania Bar Association: https://www.pabar.org/: https://www.pabar.org/
FindLaw - Pennsylvania Auto Negligence Laws: https://www.findlaw.com/state/pennsylvania-law/pennsylvania-negligence-laws.html: https://www.findlaw.com/state/pennsylvania-law/pennsylvania-negligence-laws.html"

Google Bard

Outcome: 12/19/2023 21 Minute Entry for proceedings held before MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW Settlement Conference held on 12/19/23. (amas) (Entered: 12/19/2023)
12/19/2023 22 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, WITHOUT COSTS, PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT OF COUNSEL AND LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW ON 12/19/23. 12/19/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) (Entered: 12/19/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: