Date: 05-23-2018

Case Style:

Case Number: 1:16-cr-00240-YK

Judge: Yvette Kane

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Dauphin County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Scott R Ford and Chelsea B Schinnour

Defendant's Attorney: Pro Se

Description: Harrisburg, PA - Wernersville Man Convicted Of Bank Robberies In York, Lebanon, And Berks Counties

Derek Pelker, age 28, of Wernersville, Pennsylvania, was convicted on May 18, 2018, by a jury on four counts of armed bank robbery, four counts of conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery, two counts of brandishing a firearm in relation to a crime of violence; and, two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon. Pelker represented himself during the five-day trial held before United States District Court Judge Yvette Kane.

According to U.S. Attorney David J. Freed, the jury returned a verdict of guilty after approximately two-days of deliberations and convicted Pelker of robbing the Susquehanna Bank in East Prospect, Pennsylvania on April 24, 2015; the BB&T Bank in Valley View, Pennsylvania on November 17, 2015; the Gratz Bank in Valley View, Pennsylvania on January 14, 2016; and, the M&T Bank in Lebanon, Pennsylvania on April 5, 2016.

Pelker’s co-defendants pled guilty in relation to these robberies and are awaiting sentencing:

Andrew Ishman, age 31, Wrightsville, pled guilty to the East Prospect bank robbery on October 3, 2016;
Ryan Miller, a/k/a “Otis,” age 25, Robinson Township, pled guilty to the East Prospect robbery and a separate bank robbery on December 6, 2016;
Keith Pelker, age 28, Wernersville, pled guilty to the Lebanon bank robbery on October 3, 2016;
Shannon Gadzouris, age 24, Shillington, pled guilty to the Lebanon bank robbery on October 3, 2016;
Ryan Martin, age 27, of Reading pled guilty to the two Valley View bank robberies on December 1, 2017; and
Kelsie Bair, age 28, and Lindsey School, age 27, both of Lebanon, pled guilty to accessory after the fact after they disposed of the weapon used in the Lebanon bank robbery off a pier in Ocean City, New Jersey. The weapon was ultimately recovered by the FBI scuba diving team.

One co-defendant was sentenced:

William Papoutsis, Pelker’s uncle, age 35, of Reading, pled guilty to obstruction of justice in relation to these robberies and was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment;

The investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation Capital City Violent Crimes Task Force, the Pennsylvania State Police, the South Lebanon Township Police Department, the U.S. Marshals Fugitive Task Force, and the Lebanon and York County District Attorney’s Offices. The Capital City Violent Crimes Task Force consists of representatives from the FBI’s Harrisburg Field Office and the Harrisburg Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Scott R. Ford and Chelsea Schinnour prosecuted the case.

This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. Attorney General Jeff Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, locally-based strategies to reduce violent crime.

A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

The maximum penalty for the offenses is life imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a $1,250,000 fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.

Outcome:

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: