Punitive Damages Law
 
Moawlah Albalawneh v. Dustin Scott Stipek and Marten Transport Services, Ltd.

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case is about a truck crash. Albalawneh styled his Complaint, (ECF No. 1-2), as several paragraphs of general allegations followed by two "causes of action" and a demand for "exemplary damages."

... More...
   $1 (03-06-2024 - IN)

Majdi Abu-Zahra v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

Detroit, Michigan personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability cases are like other negligence cases in that the plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) a duty owed to the plaintiff by the defendant, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) an injury proximately resulting from that breach, and (4) dam... More...
   $1 (03-06-2024 - MI)

Jaem Doe v. Dr. David J. Durkin and Ketamine Infusion of Montana, LLC

Missoula, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.... More...
   $0 (03-05-2024 - MT)

Carlos Espinoza v. Jedidiah Fowler

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In South Dakota, car accident liability is primarily determined based on fault. This means that the party responsible for causing the accident is typically held liable for the resulting damages. This is because South Dakota follows a modified comparative negligence rule.

... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - SD)

Matthew Achey and Jessica Achey v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Springfield, Missouri insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Greene County, Missouri, 2231-CC00924, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

To prove a bad faith refusal to settle claim, the plaintiff must show the insurer reserved the exclusive right to con... More...
   $0 (03-05-2024 - MO)

Mena Lucas v. Larry Taylor, et al.

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 23SL-CC02908, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still re... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - MO)

Austin Parker v. Elmer Lee McCollum and Gayle Frerichs Trucking, LLC

Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the 480th Judicial District Court of Williamson Co. TX, 23-01341-C480, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - TX)

Vanessa Doporto and Martin Rios v. Amazon Logistics, LLC

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 43rd District Court- Parker County, CV23-1283, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - TX)

Courtney Coulon, et al. v. Rasier, LLC, et al.

Washington, DC personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, 2022 CA 000031 V, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Unlike most states, Washington D.C. is a contributory negligence state. Under contributory negligence rules, victims cannot ... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - DC)

Alejandra Cabrera v. Target Corporation

Austin, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was file din the 419th Judicial District Court, Travis County, TX, D-1-GN-23-008705, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The eleme... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - TX)

Michael Eden, et al.v. Joseph Car Transport, LLC, et al.

Bluefield, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

The elements of a personal injury claim in West Virginia are: Duty of care, breach of duty of care, damages and a direct casual relationship between the two.

West Virginia is a modified comparative negligence state. Plaintiffs can be no more than 50% responsibl... More...
   $0 (03-05-2024 - VA)

Wendy Ratchford v. Manpreet Singh and Punj Aab Trucking, Inc.

Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, 24-CV-736, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 p... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - PA)

Tawfik Atik v. Talisha Thomas and Rapid Transport, Inc.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theory.

Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 percent at fault. If you are found to carry more than 50 percent of the fault for the accident, you will be unable to seek compen... More...
   $0 (03-05-2024 - PA)

Barry Nicholsn and Antio Nicholson v. Gurjant Singh and Shagan Transport, Inc.

Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Plaintiffs Barry Nicholson and Anita Nicholson (“Plaintiffs”) originally commenced this action in the Circuit Court for Dickson County, Tennessee against Defendants Gurjant Singh (“Singh”) and Shagan Transport, Inc. (“Shagan Transport”) for “injuries and damages arisin... More...
   $0 (03-04-2024 - TX)

Hebert Simmons v. Aaron Dolney, et al.

Detroit, Michigan personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court, 23-001633-NI, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The Plaintiff sought remand to the state court because the federal court lacked jurisdiction.

Michigan’s comparative negligence ... More...
   $0 (03-04-2024 - MI)

Aminata Toure v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, et al.

Austin, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the 419th District Court, Travis County, D-1-GN-22-006727, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a premises defect theory. The elements to establish a premises ... More...
   $0 (03-04-2024 - TX)

Matthew R. Richter v. Alexis Danielle Elliot

Austin, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In Texas, we are a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, you can sue for damages even if you are partially at fault for an accident. However, if you are found to be more than 50% to blame for an accident, you canno... More...
   $1 (03-04-2024 - TX)

Elijah Toler v. Edward Canterbury, III and Faircloth Roofing, Inc.

Charleston, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the accident.

... More...
   $1 (03-04-2024 - WV)

Robert Maine v. National General Insurance Company

Portland, Maine insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Cumberland County Superior Court, CV-21-00079 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

§2436-A. Unfair claims settlement practices

1. Civil actions. A person injured by any of the following actions taken by th... More...
   $1 (03-02-2024 - )

Richard Grajeda v. Vail Resorts Inc. et al.

Burlington, Vermont personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on premises liability negligence theories.

Plaintiff Richard Grajeda brings this negligence action against Vail Resorts Inc., Vail Resorts Management Company, and Okemo Limited Liability Company (collectively, “Defendants”), seeking damages for injuries he sustained in a collision with a snowmaking station ... More...
   $0 (03-02-2024 - VT)

Lakevia Mayes v. Fedex Ground Package System Inc., d/b/a Fedex Ground

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.


Under Massachusetts' comparative negligence doctrine, the award for damages the plaintiff may receive is reduced based on his/her degree of fault. A plaintiff can recover damages for his/her injuries if he/she is less than 51% at fault for the accident.
... More...
   $1 (03-02-2024 - MA)

Malory Zajdel and Adam Zajdel v. Exel Inc., d/b/a DHL Supply Chain (USA)

Detroit, Michigan personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Under Michigan negligence laws use a structure called “comparative negligence.” Essentially, when a person has been injured and files a personal injury claim seeking damages, he or she must prove the party that caused the injury was at least partially at fault for the ... More...
   $1 (03-01-2024 - MI)

Kai Lee v. State Farm General Insurance Company

San Francisco, California insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the San Francisco County Superior Court, CGC-21-597318, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. If they fail to do so, ... More...
   $0 (03-01-2024 - CA)

Alicia Couklin and Gregory Conklin v. Emma R. Hiatt

Dayton, Ohio personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.


Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.... More...
   $1 (02-29-2024 - OH)

Mariah Graves v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company, et al.

Charleston, West Virginia insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, 23-C-368, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

The elements that make up bad faith insurance lawsuits. Typically, a plaintiff
must possess these elements... More...
   $1 (02-29-2024 - WV)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: