| Imputed Fault Law |
| |
|
Amanda Wilson v. Cahoon Enterprises, LLC and Hayden Scott Parks
|
|
Fargo, North Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state It allocates fault to all parties involved, thus reducing how much each party can recover from the car accident. Since North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state, drivers can claim damages so long as they were only ... More... $0 (03-25-2024 - ND)
|
|
Troma Riss v. Ecklund Logistics, Inc., et al.
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.
Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred fro... More... $1 (03-24-2024 - MN)
|
|
Kathlene Bell and Michael Bell v. Ashley L. Griswold,
Werner Enterprises, Inc., and Platform Science, Inc.
|
|
Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.
... More... $1 (03-22-2024 - KS)
|
|
Michael Griffith, Sr., et al. v. Steffan Viernes, et al.
|
|
Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.
Under this law, the amount of compensation an injured party can receive is determined by their level of fault in relation to the accident. For example, if a court determines that the injured party is 20% at fault, their total damages award will be reduced by 20%.... More... $0 (03-22-2024 - CA)
|
|
Natasha K. Dominguez v. Landstar Systems, Inc., et al.
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, A-22-855311-C, and was removed to federal court by Landstar System, Inc. et al.
Under Nevada law, a car accident victim can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If a v... More... $0 (03-21-2024 - NV)
|
|
Anthony Imperati v. MS Gill Trucking, Inc.
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $925,000 in damages.
Connecticut is a comparative negligence state. Under this law, it's possible to recover damages in a car accident even if you are partially at fault. To do this, you must be under 50% at fault for the accident.
... More... $0 (03-20-2024 - CT)
|
|
Tiffany Gruetzmacher v. Vamar, Inc., et al.
|
|
Casper, Wyoming personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.
“At Fault” and the “51% Bar” Rules in Wyoming Per this rule, the court allocates a percentage of fault to each driver involved in a car accident, and any driver 50% or less at fault is awarded damages, which are reduced according to that driver's percen... More... $0 (03-20-2024 - WY)
|
|
Elliot Bohlar v. C.R. England
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Utah has a comparative negligence law in place that has a 50 percent fault bar. This means that if you are at least half at fault, you will not retain anything from the accident. If you are at less than half at fault, you will receive a partial damage award.
... More... $1 (03-20-2024 - UT)
|
|
Rhoddy Dance v. Sharkey Transportation, Inc.
|
|
Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Marion Superior Court 2, 49D02-2110-CT-036154, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover dam... More... $1 (03-20-2024 - IN)
|
|
Krista Lane Kimelton v. Tribe Express, Inc., et al.
|
|
Tampa, Florida personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Polk County, Florida, 2023-CA-0017894, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driver's percentage of fault will determin... More... $1 (03-19-2024 - FL)
|
|
Robert Kirkland v. Elite Transportation, Inc.
|
|
East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury track wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.
Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or dam... More... $0 (03-19-2024 - IL)
|
|
Dale D. White v. John G. Pappas and Vitracoat America, Inc.
|
|
Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the The Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, 2021 L 008366, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified compar... More... $1 (03-19-2024 - IL)
|
|
Inge Boldt v. Glenn Kassel and New Prime
|
|
St. George, Utah personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Utah has a comparative negligence law in place that has a 50 percent fault bar. This means that if you are at least half at fault, you will not retain anything from the accident. If you are at less than half at fault, you will receive a partial damage award.
... More... $0 (03-18-2024 - UT)
|
|
Larissa Araujo, et al. v. Coachella Valley Water District, et al.
|
|
San Diego, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
Comparative Negligence in California Under this law, the amount of compensation an injured party can receive is determined by their level of fault in relation to the accident. For example, if a court determines that the injured party is 20% at fault, their total damages award will... More... $1 (03-18-2024 - CA)
|
|
Celia Da Silva, et al. v. Lyft Incorporated, et al.
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case as filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2023-008744, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Arizona operates under a “comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they must take care of the r... More... $1 (03-18-2024 - AZ)
|
|
Rafael Silvas v. Favorite Healthcare Staffing, LLC, et al
|
|
Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state. The law allows you to sue for damages even if you are 99 percent at fault for your own injuries. However, as in the example above, a jury will reduce your award by your percentage of fault.
... More... $1 (03-18-2024 - MO)
|
|
Randy Moore v. Anchor Glass Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Binghamton, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.
... More... $1 (03-17-2024 - NY)
|
|
Dale Snyder, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company et al
|
|
San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.
On August 18, 2002, Marc Holland ("Holland") rented a 2002 Ford Escort from ERAC-SF. ( See Duley Decl., filed October 22, 2004, Ex. 5; Watt Decl., filed November 5, 2004, Ex. B.) At the time Holland rented the subject vehicle, his driver's license was suspended... More... $1 (03-15-2024 - CA)
|
|
Bobbieanne Molden v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
|
|
Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, 2316-CV23414, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still receive... More... $1 (03-15-2024 - MO)
|
|
Antwanette Conway v. Bryson Schrock and Door Dash, Inc.
|
|
South Bend, Indiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover damages as long as you are not more than 50 percent responsible for the accident. However, your percentage of fault will reduce the amount of c... More... $1 (03-15-2024 - IN)
|
|
Pava Logistics, Inc. PGT Trucking, Inc., et al.
|
|
Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.... More... $0 (03-14-2024 - IL)
|
|
Janaya Hatten and Robert Hatten v. Yussuf Agane, et al.
|
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, D-202-CV-22-01715, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. That means that fault can be shared among drivers, with each driver being assigned a perce... More... $0 (03-13-2024 - NM)
|
|
Rosalba Suarez, et al. v. Brandon Helvie and New Prime Inc.
|
|
El Paso, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.
Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs can sue for damages even if they are partially at fault for an accident. However, if they are found to be more than 50% to blame for an ... More... $1 (03-13-2024 - TX)
|
|
Karen Hayes v. Amy Smith
|
|
San Antonio, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, TX, 2023CI24493, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff... More... $0 (03-13-2024 - TX)
|
|
Cynthia Helder Gary v. Kwik Trip, Inc.
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred from recovering d... More... $0 (03-12-2024 - WI)
|
Next Page
|